A trade publication starts getting cited in AI Overviews
Independent trade pub with strong reporting but Article schema was missing dateModified. Added schema discipline + bylines.
Independent B2B trade publication, ~3000 articles indexed, well-known in vertical but not appearing in AI Overviews for vertical-specific queries.
Narrative
Diagnosis showed this site as a B+ that should have been an A. Authority was already strong (the pub cites primary sources well) but Structure was missing date markup hygiene and OG images on legacy posts. The team automated dateModified updates via the CMS hook and shipped a programmatic OG-image route in week 1. Week 2 was author-credentials sweep. Week 3 was the 8-pillar refresh.
Signals moved
Added dateModified to every Article JSON-LD. Bumped on real edits, not on the WordPress 'save' button.
Every author bio page now lists prior outlets, years covering the vertical, and external profile links.
Already strong — trade pubs naturally cite primary sources.
Re-published 8 evergreen pillar pages with updated 2026 stats. Reset article:modified_time on each.
Articles longer than 1500 words got an explicit H2 outline for skim-readers. AI engines extract H2-anchored chunks.
Added og:image to all articles via a programmatic OG image route (similar to /vs and /grade).
Takeaways
- 1.If you publish daily, dateModified discipline matters more than dateCreated. Engines weight 'updated' over 'first published' for freshness scoring.
- 2.Programmatic OG images per article (via next/og or equivalent) move the open-graph signal from warn to pass for thousands of pages at once.
- 3.Pillar-page refreshes can substitute for new content. A 2024 pillar republished with 2026 stats often outperforms a brand new 2026 article because of accumulated authority.
Run the audit on your site.
The full 47-signal audit tells you which of these moves applies to your URLs.
Run free audit