Peec AI vs AthenaHQ
Two YC W25 batchmates, two different bets on SMB AEO.
Both YC W25, both SMB-focused, both AEO-native. Peec bets on UX simplicity + lowest entry price ($104/mo). AthenaHQ bets on broader LLM coverage (8+ engines) + action-oriented tasks. In head-to-head answer-share tests over 30 days, AthenaHQ delivered ~45% lift vs Peec's ~8%. For 5–10 person teams that just want a simple dashboard → Peec. For teams that want execution layers → AthenaHQ.
| Feature | Peec AI | AthenaHQ |
|---|---|---|
Free trial | ||
Sub-$200/mo entry tier | ||
Multi-LLM coverage (8+) | ||
Action layer / execution tasks | ||
Looker Studio integration | partial | |
Hallucination detection | ||
Country-level geographic data | partial |
• Both YC W25 batch (Winter 2025).
• Peec: ~$104/mo entry, 3 LLMs, self-serve PLG.
• AthenaHQ: ~$270/mo entry, 8+ LLMs, credit-based AI optimizer.
• 30-day head-to-head test: AthenaHQ 45% answer-share gain vs Peec 8%.
Want the rubric, not the table?
Run your URL through the same 47-signal scoring framework AI engines use to decide what to cite. 30 seconds, no signup.
Run free audit