VectorCiteVectorCite
AEO grade · loom.com

Will AI engines citeloom.com?

C
Quick grade · 65/100

loom.com has serious AEO gaps. AI engines may not be reading or trusting your pages the way you think. The fixes are mostly cheap — schema, llms.txt, and crawl-time signals.

X LinkedIn

What we checked

  • HTTPS10 pts

    TLS responds correctly. AI crawlers won't be blocked at the network layer.

  • robots.txt + AI bots15 pts

    robots.txt blocks one or more AI engine crawlers. You are intentionally invisible to that audience.

  • llms.txt10 pts

    llms.txt found. You're telling AI engines exactly which content to ingest — a 2026 frontier signal.

  • sitemap.xml10 pts

    sitemap.xml present at the standard location. AI crawlers can enumerate your indexable surface.

  • Open Graph image10 pts

    No og:image set on the homepage. AI engine link previews and social shares fall back to generic blanks — a missed brand impression on every cite.

  • JSON-LD schema20 pts

    JSON-LD detected. Schema.org markup is the single highest-leverage signal for AI Overview eligibility.

  • <title> length5 pts

    Title length (42 chars) sits in the AI-Overview-friendly 50–60 char band.

  • meta description5 pts

    No meta description on the homepage. AI engines write their own — usually less flattering than yours.

Quick grade checks 8 signals at the homepage level. The full VectorCite audit scores 47 signals per page and runs against real buyer queries you specify.

Go deeper.

The full 47-signal audit scores your page against the buyer queries your customers actually type — and outputs the exact fixes to close the gap.

Run full audit · free